Skip to content

At the moment we can only deliver in the UK. Click here to visit Cambridge.org for international orders.

  • Bestsellers
  • Latest releases
  • Offers
  • Events

    Cart

    Your cart is empty

    Digital Scholarly Editing in Practice

    Making Oxford University Voltaire

    Author(s): Dan Barker , Nicholas Cronk , Glenn Roe

    ISBN: 9781009364331
    Publication Date: 28/05/2026
    Pages: 114
    Format: Paperback
    Sale price£14.00 GBP

    Quantity

    Pickup available at Cambridge University Press Bookshop

    Usually ready in 24 hours

    Digital Scholarly Editing in Practice

    Digital Scholarly Editing in Practice

    Cambridge University Press Bookshop

    Pickup available, Usually ready in 24 hours

    1-2 Trinity Street
    Cambridge CB2 1SZ
    United Kingdom

    +441223333333

    🚚 Please note we can only ship within the UK.

    FREE delivery on books (excluding sale).

    Delivery for other items is £1.50 - £4.50, calculated at checkout.

    T&Cs apply.

    Free click & collect on all orders.

    Scholarly editions in print have long been central to literary studies, produced according to well-established methodologies. In recent decades, digital scholarly editions have gained prominence, with some publishers digitising existing print editions and others creating born-digital resources. The shift from print to digital demands not only new editorial approaches but also sustained attention to issues of technical and financial sustainability – key concerns for resources of reference. The challenge is not merely to replicate print editions in digital form but to transcend their limitations and fully exploit the affordances of the digital medium. This essay examines these issues by focussing on one case-study: the creation of the digital Oxford University Voltaire, launched in 2026, which builds upon the Complete Works of Voltaire (205 vols, 1968–2022). By tracing the transition from print to digital, the authors aim to highlight both the opportunities and complexities inherent in scholarly editing today.