Skip to content

At the moment we can only deliver in the UK. Click here to visit Cambridge.org for international orders.

  • Bestsellers
  • Latest releases
  • Offers
  • Events

    Cart

    Your cart is empty

    Abortion Attitudes and Polarization in the American Electorate

    Author(s): Erin C. Cassese , Heather L. Ondercin , Jordan Randall

    ISBN: 9781009533157
    Publication Date: 16/01/2025
    Pages: 108
    Format: Paperback
    Sale price£18.00 GBP

    Quantity

    Pickup available at Cambridge University Press Bookshop

    Usually ready in 24 hours

    Abortion Attitudes and Polarization in the American Electorate

    Abortion Attitudes and Polarization in the American Electorate

    Cambridge University Press Bookshop

    Pickup available, Usually ready in 24 hours

    1-2 Trinity Street
    Cambridge CB2 1SZ
    United Kingdom

    +441223333333

    🚚 Please note we can only ship within the UK.

    FREE delivery on books (excluding sale).

    Delivery for other items is £1.50 - £4.50, calculated at checkout.

    T&Cs apply.

    Free click & collect on all orders.

    About two-thirds of Americans support legal abortion in many or all circumstances, and this group finds itself a frustrated majority following the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization which overturned the legal precedent set in Roe v. Wade. Previous scholarship argues intense minorities can secure favorable policy outcomes when facing off against a more diffuse and less motivated majority, creating incongruence between public opinion and policy. This Element focuses on the ways that preference intensity and partisan polarization have contributed to the current policy landscape surrounding abortion rights. Using survey data from the American National Election Studies, the authors identify Americans with intense preferences about abortion and investigate the role they play in electoral politics. They observe a shift in the relationship between partisanship and preference intensity coinciding with Dobbs and speculate about what this means for elections and policy congruence in the future.